Patterson Belknap
Microsoft has discontinued support for Internet Explorer. To access the Patterson Belknap website, please install a modern browser like Microsoft Edge or Google Chrome.
We use cookies to enhance your experience of our website and provide us with information on how you use our website. For more information about the way our site uses cookies, please read our Privacy Policy. Click "Accept Cookies" to enable cookies and third-party content or “Decline” to decline the use of cookies.
Accept CookiesDecline
mobile logo
High Contrast Mode
  • Search
  • People
  • Practices
  • Values
    Inclusion and Engagement
    Pro Bono
    Core Values
  • Firm
    About Our Firm
    Careers : Attorneys
    Careers: Business Services
    Contact Us
    Blogs & Podcasts
    Firm News
    Publications
    Events
Skip Nav
Patterson Belknap Logo
Inclusion and Engagement
Pro Bono
Core Values
About Our Firm
Careers
AttorneysBusiness Services
Contact Us
News & Resources
Blogs & PodcastsFirm NewsPublicationsEvents

Find a Person


Search
  • A
    B
    C
    D
    E
    F
    G
    H
    I
    J
    K
    L
    M
  • N
    O
    P
    Q
    R
    S
    T
    U
    V
    W
    X
    Y
    Z
  • View All
  • A
    B
    C
    D
    E
    F
    G
    H
    I
    J
    K
    L
    M
    N
    O
    P
    Q
    R
    S
    T
    U
    V
    W
    X
    Y
    Z
    View All

Find a Practice

Search
  • Corporate & Transactions
  • Exempt Organizations & Private Clients
  • Litigation, Disputes & Investigations
  • All Practices
printable-logo

Bankruptcy Update

Categories / Search
Categories / Search

Search Blog

Search
Filter By Categories:
  • Case Summaries
  • In the News
  • Industry Updates
Posts
Resource Library
Subscribe
Case Summaries

Tenth Circuit Holds that Sovereign Immunity Does Not Limit Section 544 Claim

Section 544(b)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code enables a trustee to step into the shoes of a creditor and avoid a transfer “of an interest of the debtor in property” that an unsecured creditor could avoid under applicable state law.  See...
July 27, 2023

The State of Student Loan Debt in Bankruptcy

On June 30, the Supreme Court ruled that the Biden administration did not have authority to forgive student loans under the Higher Education Relief Opportunities for Students Act of 2003 (HEROES Act).  Despite this defeat, the Biden administration is still...
July 21, 2023
Case Summaries

Court Holds Plan Administrator Didn’t Have a Conflict in Bringing a Lawsuit Against Preferred Shareholders

Sometimes we blog about cases with unusual fact patterns.  The cases don’t stand for any overriding legal principle.  They might not have application beyond the parties to them.  But they can make for good reading, giving insight into how judges...
June 28, 2023

Former Bang Energy Drink CEO Loses Bid to Control Social Media Accounts

When he was appointed by the Eleventh Circuit, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Peter D. Russin probably did not expect to have to decide who has rights to the Twitter, Instagram, and TikTok handles associated with social-media-forward energy-drink brands.  But that is...
June 26, 2023
Former Bang Energy Drink CEO Loses Bid to Control Social Media Accounts
Case Summaries

New Ruling on Remedy for Disparity in Bankruptcy Fees

We have blogged a few times about the Supreme Court’s decision in Siegel v. Fitzgerald and its implications. In Siegel, the Supreme Court invalidated the disparity in debtor-paid fees prevailing in most of 2018 between the 88 judicial districts that...
May 30, 2023

The Unique Case of Bittrex

On May 8, cryptocurrency platform Bittrex filed for chapter 11 in Delaware.  Bittrex’s first day filings emphasize that, unlike many other crypto filings over the past year, this case is not a “free fall” bankruptcy.  In fact, a plan has...
May 24, 2023

Despite Discretionary Standard, Courts Still Must Show Their Work

Although in the Ninth Circuit the decision to revisit an order under FRCP 60 is “highly discretionary,” judges still must explicitly grapple with the relevant factors.  That was the clear message sent by Judge Haywood Gilliam Jr. of the Northern...
April 28, 2023
Case Summaries

Late Appeals and Excusable Neglect: A Curious Case Where a Court Gives an Individual a Break

Persuading a bankruptcy judge to find “excusable neglect” after missing a filing deadline is usually a tough sell. You’d think it would be particularly hard when the party seeking relief was “belligerent and disrespectful to the Court and opposing counsel.” But...
April 11, 2023

Supreme Court Holds That Fraud Exception to Debt Discharge can Include Fraud by Someone Other Than the Debtor

We have previously blogged about Bartenwerfer v. Buckley, No. 21-908, a Supreme Court case concerning the scope of the fraud exception to the dischargeability of debts in bankruptcy. Section 523 of the Bankruptcy Code exempts from discharge “any debt ....
March 29, 2023

Silicon Valley Bank’s Collapse Triggers Broader Fears in the Financial Sector

Last Friday, state regulators closed the Silicon Valley Bank (SVB), a federally insured institution with 17 branches throughout California and Massachusetts.  It’s the first bank insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) to close since 2020.  In December, SVB reported...
March 13, 2023

Applying the Barton Doctrine, the Fifth Circuit Deepends Its Schism with the Eleventh

In a recent per curium opinion, the Fifth Circuit recommitted to its practice of dismissing claims against court-appointed fiduciaries when plaintiffs fail to obtain permission before bringing suit.  The court rested its decision on the Barton doctrine, which other courts,...
February 28, 2023
Case Summaries

Creditor that Filed an Excessive Claim Draws Court’s Rebuke and Possible Sanctions

This post is about a junkyard, hogs getting slaughtered, and a bankruptcy judge poised to sanction a creditor and her counsel.  The message from the case to would-be claimants in other cases is simple: do not “overreach.”  In re U Lock,...
February 6, 2023

Bankruptcy Court Issues Ruling on Ownership of Celsius Account Assets

The concept of “property of the estate” is important in bankruptcy because it determines what property can be used or distributed for the benefit of the debtor’s creditors. Defined by section 541 of the Bankruptcy Code, “property of the estate”...
January 31, 2023

A Primer on Avoidance Actions in the Context of Crypto Bankruptcies

In 2022, there were several high-profile crypto bankruptcy filings.  A big question in these cases is whether there will be any money to satisfy unsecured creditor claims.  If there are funds to distribute, then the creditors’ claims will become more...
January 30, 2023
Case Summaries

Substantial Contribution: A New Decision from the Third Circuit

It’s often hard to persuade a bankruptcy court to grant a motion for substantial contribution.  Any attorney thinking about making a motion should first ask herself two questions.  First, has my work benefitted both my client and other creditors?  Second,...
January 4, 2023
Case Summaries

Second Circuit Reaffirms that Debtor Can Obtain Refund for Non-Uniform Bankruptcy Fees

We have previously blogged about Siegel v. Fitzgerald, the Supreme Court decision last June that invalidated the 2018 difference in fees between bankruptcy cases filed in Bankruptcy Administrator judicial districts and U.S. Trustee judicial districts.  As we explained, the parties...
December 1, 2022

Crypto Company FTX Files Massive Bankruptcy in Delaware

Another domino has fallen.  Earlier this year, we wrote about the challenges facing the crypto industry that resulted in the bankruptcy filings of Three Arrows Capital, Celsius Network, and Voyager Digital. We noted that other crypto entities could also end...
November 22, 2022

SCOTUS Grants Certiorari, Remands U.S. Trustee Fee Dispute to Second Circuit

The ramifications of uneven increases to fees in chapter 11 bankruptcies continue to ripple through federal courts.  As we discussed previously, Congress enacted legislation in 2017 that temporarily increased U.S. Trustee fees chapter 11 debtors had to pay in virtually...
October 31, 2022
Case Summaries

Bankruptcy Court Denies Chapter 15 Recognition to a Case in the Isle of Man

A U.S. bankruptcy court recently denied chapter 15 recognition to a case in the Isle of Man (IOM).  The court ruled that the foreign case was neither a foreign main proceeding nor a foreign non-main proceeding.  Although the IOM proceeding...
October 25, 2022
Case Summaries

New SDNY Decision on Administrative Priority for Executory Contracts

To encourage parties to transact with debtors in bankruptcy, the Bankruptcy Code in corporate bankruptcies provides highest priority to “administrative expenses,” which include “the actual, necessary costs and expenses of preserving the estate.”  11 U.S.C. § 503(b); id. § 507(a)(2). ...
September 30, 2022
Industry Updates

What to Do If Your Tenant Is Bankrupt

On September 15, President Biden announced a tentative deal with unions representing tens of thousands of railroad workers that helped narrowly avoid a strike that threatened to devastate the country’s delicate supply chains that have been strained since the beginning...
September 28, 2022
Case Summaries

Court Says Creditor Can Sue a Liquidating Trustee without Prior Permission

A bankruptcy court ruled that a creditor didn’t need to seek derivative standing to sue a liquidating trustee.  The creditor, himself a trustee of the debtor’s employee stock-option plan, had standing to sue without prior court permission because his suit...
August 30, 2022

For Hawaiian Golf Project, it’s Aloha New Ownership, Aloha Old Debt

The owners of an ambitious Hawaiian golf project in the Makaha Valley of Oahu said Aloha (hello) to new owners, and Aloha (goodbye) to old debt obligations. In an adversary proceeding, the collective owners of the Makaha Valley Country Club, golf...
August 17, 2022

It’s Getting Chilly: The “Cryptowinter” Marches On

It’s been a hard year for cryptocurrency.  The values of most cryptocurrencies, including major coins such as Bitcoin and Ethereum, have continued to tumble.  In fact, the price of one stablecoin, which is a form of cryptocurrency tied to another...
July 28, 2022

Supreme Court Invalidates Chapter 11 Fee Scheme

We have previously written about Siegel v. Fitzgerald, No. 21-441, the Supreme Court case considering the question of whether the 2018 difference in fees between Bankruptcy Administrator judicial districts and U.S. Trustee judicial districts was consistent with the Constitution’s uniformity...
July 28, 2022

Delaware Court Finds Texas’s Trust Fund Doctrine Lives, but Debtor's Fiduciary Claims Dead on Arrival

A Delaware bankruptcy court recently held that Texas’s “trust fund doctrine” remains applicable for companies that have not availed themselves of Texas’s formal dissolution process.  Nonetheless, fiduciary claims by a chapter 7 debtor were dismissed because the debtor failed to assert...
June 30, 2022
Case Summaries

Supreme Court Refuses to Consider the Constitutionality of the Equitable Mootness Doctrine

The doctrine of equitable mootness is in the news again.  The Supreme Court recently denied a cert. petition in a case where the petitioner wanted the doctrine ruled unconstitutional. KK-PB Financial LLC v. 160 Royal Palm LLC, Case No. 21-1197,...
June 13, 2022

Crypto Exchange Platforms Grapple with Consequence of Filing Bankruptcy

In the world of cryptocurrency, exchange platforms act as intermediaries allowing investors to buy and sell assets while making money through commissions and transaction fees.  Any assets purchased may be held in either non-custodial or custodial wallets.  If a customer...
May 23, 2022
Case Summaries

Supreme Court Agrees to Hear a Case About the Scope of the Fraud Exception to Discharge

A discharge in bankruptcy usually discharges a debtor from the debtor’s liabilities.  Section 523 of the Bankruptcy Code, however, sets forth certain exceptions to this policy, including for “any debt . . . for money, property, services, or an extension,...
May 18, 2022

Fiduciary Duties Waivable by Contract, Precluding Claims

The U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Manhattan recently reminded us why Delaware choice-of-law provisions are so popular in limited partnership and other agreements.  In an adversary proceeding, Judge David S. Jones held that proposed fiduciary claims were futile because of the...
April 29, 2022
Case Summaries

Equitable Mootness Applied Again: The Fifth Circuit Refuses to Hear an Appeal

The Fifth Circuit recently dismissed an appeal of a confirmation order as equitably moot.  The decision was based on three key factors: the appellant hadn’t obtained a stay pending appeal, the plan had been substantially consummated, and practical relief couldn’t...
April 18, 2022

Releases: How Did We Get Here and What is Next?

As a result of Purdue Pharma’s proposed plan of reorganization, and the ongoing opioid epidemic that continues to grip the nation, the debate over non-consensual third-party releases has gone mainstream despite being a popular tool for debtors for decades. The...
March 28, 2022
Case Summaries

Supreme Court to Consider Constitutionality of Chapter 11 Fees

Article I, Section 8 of the United States Constitution gives Congress the power to “establish . . .  uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States.”  While Congress has general authority to establish a bankruptcy system, bankruptcy...
March 4, 2022

Bankruptcy Court Won’t Dabble in Case Concerning a Marijuana Business

“[E]nsnared between his involvement in a business that is legal under the laws of Arizona but illegal under federal law,” one debtor’s chapter 13 petition was recently dismissed due to his undisputed violations of the Controlled Substances Act. In November...
February 11, 2022
Case Summaries

Fireworks in the Sky but not in Court: Bankruptcy Judge Takes a Practical Approach to the Ordinary Course of Business Defense

A recent decision applied the ordinary course of business defense to a preferential transfer claim where the parties had engaged in only two transactions.  In re Reagor Dykes Motors, LP, Case No. 18-50214, Adv. No. 20-05031, 2022 LEXIS 70 (Bankr....
January 24, 2022
Case Summaries

Creditors Barred from Asserting $53 Million Claim: A Look at the Excusable Neglect Standard

Another case shows the perils of waiting until the final minutes to meet a court deadline.  In re U-Haul, 21-bk-20140, 2021 Bankr LEXIS 3373 (Bankr. S.D. W. Va. Dec. 10, 2021). The debtor is a well-known truck rental company.  Years before the...
December 20, 2021

Considering the Conduct of Two PPP “Fraudsters,” Bankruptcy Court Shows Its Teeth but Declines to Bite (For Now)

“Messrs. Woods and Wu are fraudsters,” Judge Christopher S. Sontchi declared in the opening salvo of his scathing opinion.  According to the former Chief Judge of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware, Woods and Wu fraudulently obtained...
November 29, 2021
Case Summaries

One Bankruptcy Court’s Analysis of a Motion to Dismiss Avoidance Claims: The Analytical Framework

A federal judge recently allowed a trustee’s preferential transfer claim against a law firm to proceed but dismissed a constructive fraudulent transfer claim.  The decision highlights the pleading standards and analytical framework for motions to dismiss such claims.  Insys Liquidation...
November 11, 2021

Recent Decision on Derivative Standing by a Creditors’ Committee to Challenge a Lender’s Liens

In many chapter 11 cases, creditors’ committees play a vital role in maximizing the recoveries of unsecured creditors. But the powers of creditors’ committees are circumscribed by both the Bankruptcy Code and case law. One way committees try to enhance...
October 28, 2021

Unqualified CARES Act Funds Can't Be Used To Pay Creditors

U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Craig A. Gargotta rejected a debtor’s attempt to use CARES Act funds, which it did not actually qualify for, to pay creditors in its chapter 11 case.  BR Healthcare Solutions (the “Debtor”) operated a nursing home under the...
October 19, 2021

Bankruptcy Courts Must Independently Assess Chapter 13 Plans

In a recent decision, a district court reversed the decision of the bankruptcy court and clarified the independent obligation of the Bankruptcy Court to ensure that a Chapter 13 Plan satisfies the necessary requirements of the Bankruptcy Code, irrespective of the parties’ conduct.  In...
October 1, 2021
Case Summaries

Equitable Mootness on the Ropes

Earlier this month – citing the “virtually unflagging obligation” of an Article III appellate court to exercise its subject matter jurisdiction – the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals decried the pervasive overreliance by district courts on the doctrine “equitable mootness”...
August 30, 2021

When Potentially Violating “Gatekeeping” Orders, Asking for Permission May Be Easier (And Cheaper!) Than Begging for Forgiveness

Judge Stacey Jernigan did not mince words in a recent opinion sanctioning the former CEO of Highland Capital Management, LP.  Entities related to the former CEO brought suit against Highland (the debtor in a Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceeding), and sought...
August 13, 2021
Case Summaries

Above-Board: Officers of a Corporation Not Entitled to Key Employee Retention Plan Payments

A key goal of the Bankruptcy Code is to prevent corporate insiders from profiting from their employer’s misfortune. Section 503(c) of the Code makes clear: “there shall neither be allowed, nor paid... a transfer made to, or an obligation incurred...
August 5, 2021
Case Summaries

Critical Vendors Aren’t Immune from Lawsuits to Recover Preferential Transfers

Some courts permit debtors to designate vendors crucial to their business as “critical vendors.”  These are vendors that supply debtors with necessary goods or services.  With court permission, debtors are allowed to pay critical vendors amounts owing when a bankruptcy...
July 26, 2021
Case Summaries

New Court Ruling on Whether Avoidance Powers Require Benefit to Creditors

The Bankruptcy Code grants the power to avoid certain transactions to a bankruptcy trustee or debtor-in-possession.  See, e.g., 11 U.S.C. §§ 544, 547–48.  Is there a general requirement that these avoidance powers only be used when doing so would benefit...
July 21, 2021
In the News

Executory Contracts: Third Circuit Does Not Recognize the Doctrine of Implied Assumption

A recent case before bankruptcy judge Karen B. Owens of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware, In re Dura Auto. Sys., LLC, No. 19-12378 (KBO), 2021 WL 2456944 (Bankr. D. Del. June 16, 2021), provides a...
July 8, 2021

Maryland Court Discharges Student Debt

As we reported, on June 21, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to revisit the rigid Brunner standard for determining “undue hardship” capable of discharging student debt.  The same day, United States Bankruptcy Judge Michelle M. Harner applied the Brunner...
July 2, 2021

Page 2 of 7

About Our Blog

Bankruptcy Update Blog provides current news and analysis of key bankruptcy cases and developments in US and cross-border matters. Patterson Belknap’s Business Reorganization and Creditors’ Rights attorneys represent creditors’ committees, trade creditors, indenture trustees, and bankruptcy trustees and examiners in US and international insolvency cases. Our team includes highly skilled and experienced attorneys who represent clients in some of the most complex cases in courts throughout the US and elsewhere.

Read More

Blog Contributors

  • Contact Daniel A. Lowenthal.

    Daniel A. Lowenthal

    212.336.2720

    Email

  • Contact Kimberly Black.

    Kimberly Black

    212.336.2511

    Email

Posts
Resource Library
Subscribe

Firm Highlights

Publication
Not Over Yet?: Drug Manufacturers Eye Potential Circuit Split on Federal Drug Pricing Program
The Inflation Reduction Act’s Drug Price Negotiation Program has been the subject of litigation since Congress passed it in 2022 in an effort to curb the cost to Medicare of brand-name pharmaceutical drugs. These challenges—initiated in federal court by major pharmaceutical manufacturers—have largely been unsuccessful, rejected in both federal district and appeals courts in the Second and Third Circuits, with writs of certiorari uniformly denied by the U.S. Supreme Court. But all hope is not yet lost for pharmaceutical manufacturers’ opposition to the DPNP. A few challenges remain pending in the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the District of Columbia and Fifth Circuits, with the latter signaling potential receptiveness to the manufacturers’ positions at oral argument. To continue reading Amy Vegari and...
Firm News
Firm Achieves Appellate Victory on Behalf of Gilead Sciences
On August 13, 2026, Patterson Belknap secured a significant appellate victory for our client, Gilead Sciences, Inc. (“Gilead”), in a trademark lawsuit brought to stop the alleged illegal importation and sale in the United States of international, non-FDA-approved Gilead medicines. The Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court’s issuance of a preliminary injunction against all defendants in the action, enjoining them from violating Gilead’s trademark rights by importing or facilitating the importation of these foreign medicines through illicit and potentially unsafe channels. The lawsuit was initially filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland in December 2024, after Gilead received a report from a concerned physician that a Maryland patient had received through the mail...
Publication
SEC Proposes Regulation E-Delivery: Default Electronic Delivery for Federal Securities Law Communications
On July 16, 2026, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC” or “Commission”) proposed Regulation E-Delivery[i], a new regulatory framework that would permit covered entities to deliver required information to investors and other recipients electronically as the default method, without first obtaining affirmative consent. In an accompanying statement, SEC Chairman Paul S. Atkins characterized the proposal as “an important step toward allowing the financial services industry to harness technology for the benefit of everyday American investors” and “another stride toward a regulatory framework suitable for the modern era.”[ii] Proposed Regulation E-Delivery would establish uniform conditions under which the federal securities laws’ information delivery requirements are satisfied by electronic delivery. The proposal would generally supersede the Commission’s 1995[iii] and 1996[iv] e-delivery...
Event
Clint Morrison to Speak at Kisaco Research's 2026 Trade Secret Legal Protection North America Conference
On Monday, September 14, Partner Clint Morrison will speak on a panel at Kisaco Research's 2026 Trade Secret Legal Protection North America Conference titled "Reverse Engineering and Trade Secret Misappropriation: Where Courts are Drawing the Line." Mr. Morrison will join Carl Alexander Dinges (Partner, Bonabry), Eda Stark (Global IP Transactions & Litigation Managing Counsel, Olympus), and Victoria Cundiff (Adjust Professor, University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School) to discuss when a reverse engineering defense may be helpful, and how recent decisions have brought the defense under the spotlight. To learn more, please click here.
Firm News
Firm Amicus Brief Plays Key Role in U.S. Supreme Court Dissent
Patterson Belknap submitted an amicus brief that played a significant role in Justice Sonia Sotomayor's June 29, 2026 dissent in Trump v. Slaughter. The brief was filed on behalf of legal historians Noah A. Rosenblum and Nathaniel Donahue, arguing that the concepts "quasi-legislative" and "quasi-judicial" as used in Humphrey's Executor had long histories in American law and provide workable definitions to guide the Court's review of congressional limitations.  In the dissent, Justice Sotomayor, joined by Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown-Jackson, cited the brief extensively. Justice Sotomayor relied on the brief to explain that the concepts were well-established well before the Humphrey's decision, and were used by many political figures and by courts developing a “quasi-judicial” category for officers whose duties resembled a judge’s. To read the amicus brief, please...
Publication
SEC Proposes Regulation E-Delivery: How Will E-Delivery Work?
On July 16, 2026, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC” or “Commission”) proposed Regulation E-Delivery[i], a new regulatory framework that would permit covered entities to deliver required information to investors and other recipients electronically as the default method, without first obtaining affirmative consent. In Part 1 of this 3-Part series, we provided an overview of proposed Regulation E-Delivery and defined its key concepts, including covered entities, covered information, and covered recipients. In this Part 2, we provide a high-level overview of how electronic delivery as proposed under Regulation E-Delivery is expected to function. In Part 3, we will address the practical implications Regulation E-Delivery is expected to have on covered entities. How Electronic Delivery is Expected to Work Electronic Address and...
Blog Post
Regulation E-Delivery: SEC Proposes to Make Electronic Communication the Default
On July 16, 2026, the Securities and Exchange Commission announced a proposed rule to broaden many financial market participants’ use of electronic communications with investors and others who receive information pursuant to federal securities laws.[1]  Referred to as “Reg E-Delivery,” the new rule aims to help issuers and others who disseminate SEC-required information transition away from delivering paper documents, a communication method the Agency pointed out imposes “unnecessary costs and expenses” while “no longer reflect[ing] the preference of most investors.”[2] Commenting on the proposed rule, Chair Atkins stated: The world has changed dramatically since many of our rules were first adopted. But, all too often, our regulatory framework has remained static. … In an age of artificial intelligence and blockchain technology, a...
Blog Post
SEC Enforcement Launches New Financial Reporting and Accounting Unit
On August 5, 2026, the Securities and Exchange Commission announced its most recent step in its shift of enforcement priorities with the establishment of a new Financial Reporting and Accounting Unit.[1] According to the SEC’s press release, the Unit will operate within the Enforcement Division as a central resource for all SEC divisions pursuing financial reporting fraud as well as broader efforts.[2] This move is the latest in Chair Atkin’s efforts to “retur[n] the agency to its core mission of protecting investors; facilitating capital formation; and maintaining fair, orderly, and efficient markets.”[3] Commenting on the new unit’s launch, David Woodcock, Director of the Agency’s Enforcement Division, stated: Since my return to the Division, I have been assessing every aspect of our staffing to...
Blog Post
Fees Recoverable by Oversecured Creditors in Bankruptcy: The Application of Code Sections 506(b) and 502(b)
Bankruptcy Code section 506(b) entitles an oversecured creditor to post-petition interest and reasonable fees and other charges. Are a creditor’s pre-petition charges also subject to a court’s view of what is reasonable? Courts are split on this issue. A judge in New York recently explained why, in his view, reasonableness is not the right standard for the pre-petition portion of a claim. Pre-petition charges should be determined by applicable state law and not a judge’s analysis of what is reasonable. In re 1300 Desert Willow Road, LLC, No. 25-11375, 2026 WL 2088511 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Jul. 20, 2026). The debtor is a single-asset real estate company. The creditor had loaned the debtor $20 million secured by a mortgage on real property. The debtor...
Firm News
Patterson Belknap Recognized by Chambers in its 2026 High Net Worth Guide
Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler is pleased to announce that the firm has been recognized by Chambers High Net Worth 2026 in the following practice areas: Art and Cultural Property Law – USA-Nationwide Private Wealth Law – New York Chambers is a leading independent professional legal research company, delivering detailed rankings and insights into the world’s top lawyers and law firms. Its research methodology includes detailed interviews with clients and peers and analysis of capabilities, achievement, and sector presence. The firm also received individual recognitions by Chambers in both practice areas: Anne-Laure Alléhaut is ranked in the Art and Cultural Property Law practice area in the USA. Michael Arlein is ranked in the Private Wealth Law practice area in New York. Comments regarding the firm in the Chambers High Net Worth...
Publication
Not Over Yet?: Drug Manufacturers Eye Potential Circuit Split on Federal Drug Pricing Program
The Inflation Reduction Act’s Drug Price Negotiation Program has been the subject of litigation since Congress passed it in 2022 in an effort to curb the cost to Medicare of brand-name pharmaceutical drugs. These challenges—initiated in federal court by major pharmaceutical manufacturers—have largely been unsuccessful, rejected in both federal district and appeals courts in the Second and Third Circuits, with writs of certiorari uniformly denied by the U.S. Supreme Court. But all hope is not yet lost for pharmaceutical manufacturers’ opposition to the DPNP. A few challenges remain pending in the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the District of Columbia and Fifth Circuits, with the latter signaling potential receptiveness to the manufacturers’ positions at oral argument. To continue reading Amy Vegari and...
Firm News
Firm Achieves Appellate Victory on Behalf of Gilead Sciences
On August 13, 2026, Patterson Belknap secured a significant appellate victory for our client, Gilead Sciences, Inc. (“Gilead”), in a trademark lawsuit brought to stop the alleged illegal importation and sale in the United States of international, non-FDA-approved Gilead medicines. The Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court’s issuance of a preliminary injunction against all defendants in the action, enjoining them from violating Gilead’s trademark rights by importing or facilitating the importation of these foreign medicines through illicit and potentially unsafe channels. The lawsuit was initially filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland in December 2024, after Gilead received a report from a concerned physician that a Maryland patient had received through the mail...
Publication
SEC Proposes Regulation E-Delivery: Default Electronic Delivery for Federal Securities Law Communications
On July 16, 2026, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC” or “Commission”) proposed Regulation E-Delivery[i], a new regulatory framework that would permit covered entities to deliver required information to investors and other recipients electronically as the default method, without first obtaining affirmative consent. In an accompanying statement, SEC Chairman Paul S. Atkins characterized the proposal as “an important step toward allowing the financial services industry to harness technology for the benefit of everyday American investors” and “another stride toward a regulatory framework suitable for the modern era.”[ii] Proposed Regulation E-Delivery would establish uniform conditions under which the federal securities laws’ information delivery requirements are satisfied by electronic delivery. The proposal would generally supersede the Commission’s 1995[iii] and 1996[iv] e-delivery...
Event
Clint Morrison to Speak at Kisaco Research's 2026 Trade Secret Legal Protection North America Conference
On Monday, September 14, Partner Clint Morrison will speak on a panel at Kisaco Research's 2026 Trade Secret Legal Protection North America Conference titled "Reverse Engineering and Trade Secret Misappropriation: Where Courts are Drawing the Line." Mr. Morrison will join Carl Alexander Dinges (Partner, Bonabry), Eda Stark (Global IP Transactions & Litigation Managing Counsel, Olympus), and Victoria Cundiff (Adjust Professor, University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School) to discuss when a reverse engineering defense may be helpful, and how recent decisions have brought the defense under the spotlight. To learn more, please click here.
Firm News
Firm Amicus Brief Plays Key Role in U.S. Supreme Court Dissent
Patterson Belknap submitted an amicus brief that played a significant role in Justice Sonia Sotomayor's June 29, 2026 dissent in Trump v. Slaughter. The brief was filed on behalf of legal historians Noah A. Rosenblum and Nathaniel Donahue, arguing that the concepts "quasi-legislative" and "quasi-judicial" as used in Humphrey's Executor had long histories in American law and provide workable definitions to guide the Court's review of congressional limitations.  In the dissent, Justice Sotomayor, joined by Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown-Jackson, cited the brief extensively. Justice Sotomayor relied on the brief to explain that the concepts were well-established well before the Humphrey's decision, and were used by many political figures and by courts developing a “quasi-judicial” category for officers whose duties resembled a judge’s. To read the amicus brief, please...
Publication
SEC Proposes Regulation E-Delivery: How Will E-Delivery Work?
On July 16, 2026, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC” or “Commission”) proposed Regulation E-Delivery[i], a new regulatory framework that would permit covered entities to deliver required information to investors and other recipients electronically as the default method, without first obtaining affirmative consent. In Part 1 of this 3-Part series, we provided an overview of proposed Regulation E-Delivery and defined its key concepts, including covered entities, covered information, and covered recipients. In this Part 2, we provide a high-level overview of how electronic delivery as proposed under Regulation E-Delivery is expected to function. In Part 3, we will address the practical implications Regulation E-Delivery is expected to have on covered entities. How Electronic Delivery is Expected to Work Electronic Address and...
Litigation, Disputes & Investigationsicon right
Exempt Organizations & Private Clientsicon right
Corporate & Transactionsicon right
  • Contact Us
  • Subscribe
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy

1133 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York 10036 | Tel: 212.336.2000
© 2026 Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney Advertising. Website Credits