Patterson Belknap
Microsoft has discontinued support for Internet Explorer. To access the Patterson Belknap website, please install a modern browser like Microsoft Edge or Google Chrome.
We use cookies to enhance your experience of our website and provide us with information on how you use our website. For more information about the way our site uses cookies, please read our Privacy Policy. Click "Accept Cookies" to enable cookies and third-party content or “Decline” to decline the use of cookies.
Accept CookiesDecline
mobile logo
High Contrast Mode
  • Search
  • People
  • Practices
  • Values
    Inclusion and Engagement
    Pro Bono
    Core Values
  • Firm
    About Our Firm
    Careers : Attorneys
    Careers: Business Services
    Contact Us
    Blogs & Podcasts
    Firm News
    Publications
    Events
Skip Nav
Patterson Belknap Logo
Inclusion and Engagement
Pro Bono
Core Values
About Our Firm
Careers
AttorneysBusiness Services
Contact Us
News & Resources
Blogs & PodcastsFirm NewsPublicationsEvents

Find a Person


Search
  • A
    B
    C
    D
    E
    F
    G
    H
    I
    J
    K
    L
    M
  • N
    O
    P
    Q
    R
    S
    T
    U
    V
    W
    X
    Y
    Z
  • View All
  • A
    B
    C
    D
    E
    F
    G
    H
    I
    J
    K
    L
    M
    N
    O
    P
    Q
    R
    S
    T
    U
    V
    W
    X
    Y
    Z
    View All

Find a Practice

Search
  • Corporate & Transactions
  • Exempt Organizations & Private Clients
  • Litigation, Disputes & Investigations
  • All Practices
printable-logo

Publications

Search

March 1, 2018

New Limits on Whistleblower Protection: SCOTUS Makes SEC Reporting a Mandatory Requirement

February 27, 2018

Newman’s Own Law

February 27, 2018

Prepare for New Claims Procedures for Disability Benefit Plans

February 26, 2018

NYC Sick Leave Gets a New Companion: Safe Leave

February 26, 2018

SEC Refreshes Cyber Guidance: Key Takeaways

February 22, 2018

Supreme Court Rejection of CareFirst Review Prolongs Data Breach Standing Circuit Split

February 14, 2018

Supreme Court Asked, Again, to Weigh In on Data Breach Standing as Circuit Split Widens

February 1, 2018

Patent dance remains on point

January 29, 2018

How Cos. Can Take Advantage Of DOJ False Claims Act Memo

January 16, 2018

Sweeping Tax Reform Impacts Tax-Exempt Organizations

January 10, 2018

In Rare Ruling Vacating Sentence as Procedurally, Substantively Unreasonable, Second Circuit Expounds on the Role of Mercy

January 3, 2018

Ganek v. Leibowitz and a Proposal to Reform Search Warrant Procedure

January 2, 2018

Effect of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act on Trust and Estate Planning

December 21, 2017

Impact on Commuter Benefits Programs

December 18, 2017

Unpaid Interns Back in the Spotlight: Second Circuit Hands Employers a Win

December 15, 2017

Federal Circuit: BPCIA Preempts State Law In Biosimilar Litigation

December 12, 2017

A Question of Privilege: Court Wrestles With Attorney-Client and Work Product Issues in Data Breach Case

December 8, 2017

Mixed Results as IPR Petitions for Biosimilars Soar

December 5, 2017

Bringing Cayman Derivative Claims In NY Just Got Easier

November 30, 2017

House Passes Tax Bill; Senate Proposal on Track for Vote

November 13, 2017

Federal Tax Reform May Affect Estate Planning

November 9, 2017

A Question of Privilege: Court Wrestles With Attorney-Client and Work Product Issues in Data Breach Case

November 7, 2017

Proposed Tax Reform Bill Impacts Philanthropy and Tax-Exempt Organizations

November 1, 2017

Fed. Circ. Clarifies Law For Functional Antibody Claims

October 25, 2017

The Supreme Court’s interpretation of the biosimilars statute and the value of certainty

October 24, 2017

Additional Hurricane Relief for Retirement Plan Participants Makes Landfall

October 24, 2017

What Not to Learn From Equifax: Five Big Lessons

October 5, 2017

A New Strain Of Inequitable Conduct Litigation

October 4, 2017

First Department Sustains Claims Against Fund Administrator After Hackers Grab Millions

October 2, 2017

Newman’s ‘Meaningfully Close Personal Relationship’ Requirement No Longer Good Law

September 26, 2017

IRS Relaxes Rules for Plan Loans and Hardship Distributions for Hurricane Harvey and Hurricane Irma Victims

September 12, 2017

City Select v. BMW: Ascertainability Is Alive And Well In The Third Circuit

September 5, 2017

A (Temporary?) Reprieve: Employers No Longer Required to Submit Pay Data to the EEOC

August 8, 2017

Paid Family Leave Regulations Delivered in Full: Now What?

August 1, 2017

The Soft Power Of Congress To Challenge Mergers

July 27, 2017

Petrobras Renounces 2nd Circ. 'Preference' For Class Cert.

July 21, 2017

Silver Conviction Vacated Due to Jury Instructions

July 14, 2017

Petrobras Does Little To Clarify Class Ascertainability

July 10, 2017

SCOTUS to Decide if Cell Site Location Is Protected by Fourth Amendment

July 5, 2017

A Minute Guide to Minutes

June 15, 2017

High Court Interprets The Biosimilars Statute — What Now?

June 8, 2017

High Court Puts An End To Unfair Asset Forfeiture

June 8, 2017

Supreme Court Unanimously Holds SEC Disgorgement Is Subject to Five-Year Limitations Period

June 7, 2017

Town Of Chester: An Answer On Class-Member Standing?

June 5, 2017

The Final Push: New York Delivers a Revised Version of Paid Family Leave Rules

May 24, 2017

The UFC’s Biggest Bout Yet: Its Fighters’ Antitrust Lawsuit

May 9, 2017

Puerto Rico Files for Bankruptcy: New York Judge to Hear Case

May 8, 2017

Money Isn’t Everything: NYC Bars Employer Inquiry Into Salary Histories

Page 11 of 19

Subscribe

Sign up

Firm Highlights

Publication
DOJ Revises Justice Manual to Strengthen False Claims Act Enforcement
On September 18, 2026, the Department of Justice announced two revisions to the Justice Manual aimed at strengthening False Claims Act (“FCA”) enforcement. The first revision reinforces DOJ's longstanding position that sub-regulatory guidance cannot impose legal obligations beyond those established by statute or regulation. The second—and, for companies facing qui tam litigation exposure, the more consequential—directs DOJ attorneys to consider exercising the government's dismissal authority when it declines to intervene in a qui tam action. In particular, where the government does not seek immediate dismissal, the new guidance calls for DOJ to revisit that assessment as the litigation progresses. In other words, when DOJ declines to join a whistleblower lawsuit, its attorneys are now encouraged to affirmatively dismiss unmeritorious complaints....
Firm News
Firm Secures Complete Patent Litigation Victory on Behalf of J&J
On August 31, 2026, Patterson Belknap secured a victory on behalf of Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson) in a Hatch-Waxman patent infringement litigation relating to Spravato®, its blockbuster esketamine nasal spray approved for the treatment of treatment-resistant depression and major depressive disorder with suicidal ideation. This litigation was initiated after an ANDA filing by Sandoz, Inc. (“Sandoz”) in 2023, seeking FDA approval for its generic version of Spravato. Janssen asserted that Sandoz’s proposed generic product would infringe certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 11,446,260, 10,869,844; 11,173,134; and 11,311,500.  Sandoz counterclaimed for declaratory judgment that each of the asserted patent claims was invalid under 35 U.S.C. §103 and/or § 112.  On August 31, 2026, the U.S. District...
Publication
New York Appellate Court Limits the Manhattan DA’s Use of Criminal Turnover Orders to Resolve Disputed Art Ownership
On September 17, 2026, the New York Appellate Division, First Department, issued a major decision in In the Matter of an Application for a Search Warrant to Search the Premises Located at The Art Institute of Chicago. The court considered whether N.Y. Penal Law § 450.10, a criminal turnover statute, authorizes a court to adjudicate disputed ownership of property and order its surrender without affording the holder full civil due process (and instead proceeding by way of a summary proceeding in criminal court). The First Department unanimously held that it does not, vacating a seizure warrant and turnover orders that had directed the Art Institute of Chicago (“AIC”) to surrender a painting to the heirs of a Holocaust victim. (Slip Op....
Blog Post
AI Companies Find Value in Bankrupt Companies
Spirit Airlines filed for bankruptcy in November 2024 and, after emerging from bankruptcy, filed again in August 2025. During the second case, the company tried to find a way to keep the airline in business but to no avail. In May 2026, Spirit Airlines pivoted towards a wind-down and ceased operations. This summer, as a part of its wind-down, Spirit Airlines began marketing its remaining assets. It had plenty of traditional assets to sell. For example, the debtors’ bid procedures motion filed in May 2026 listed the following assets: takeoff and landing slots at LaGuardia Airport; aircraft hangar(s); corporate headquarters; training center; multi-family residential buildings; ground service equipment; spare engines; flight simulators; aircraft maintenance equipment; and assets related to the...
Blog Post
You Win Some and Lose Some: Judge Liman Decides Competing Motions to Compel
On September 4, 2026, District Judge Lewis J. Liman (S.D.N.Y.) granted in part and denied in part Plaintiff Lashify, Inc.’s (“Lashify”) motion to compel discovery and denied Defendants Qingdao Network Technology Co., Ltd., d/b/a UCoolMe and Vivicute Limited’s (“UCoolMe”) motion to compel. Lashify, Inc. v. Qingdao Network Tech. Co., Ltd., No. 25-cv-4183 (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 4, 2026). Lashify’s Motion to Compel Lashify moved to compel UCoolMe to provide responses to discovery requests relating to: (i) product samples and raw materials; (ii) manufacturing; (iii) employees and supply chain; (iv) marketing; and (v) finances. Id. at *2. The Court found that each of those topics were relevant under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a) and that UCoolMe did not sufficiently respond to discovery requests related to...
Blog Post
Delaware Bankruptcy Court Crafts Test Concerning Post-Confirmation “Related-To” Jurisdiction
The filing of a bankruptcy case creates an estate consisting of the debtor’s legal and equitable property. The estate will continue until the debtor’s confirmed plan of reorganization or liquidation goes effective. It will then terminate, and the property will either revest in the reorganized debtor or be transferred to another entity such as a post-confirmation liquidation trust. Now and then, bankruptcy judges face this issue: after plan confirmation, when can a liquidation trustee assert state law claims in a lawsuit filed in the bankruptcy court? In terms of a bankruptcy court’s subject matter jurisdiction, the question can be articulated this way: when can a bankruptcy court have post-confirmation related-to jurisdiction over such claims under 28 U.S.C. section 1334?[i] A bankruptcy judge...
Event
Greg Baker to Speak at Practising Law Institute's Broker/Dealer Regulation and Enforcement 2026
On Thursday, October 8, Partner Greg Baker will speak on a panel at the Practising Law Institute's Broker/Dealer Regulation and Enforcement 2026 conference titled "Ethical Issues Facing Lawyers in the Financial Services Industry." Mr. Baker will join James Q. Walker (Partner, Ashurst Perkins Coie), Allison Cambria (Head of Litigation and Regulatory Enforcement - Americas, Deutsche Bank), Ilene B. Marquardt (Head of Legal Engagement, Client Relationship Group, Wells Fargo Advisors), and Christopher K. Williams (Associate General Counsel, Fidelity Investments) to share guidance on managing conflicts of interest and privilege issues. To learn more, please click here.
Publication
Pharmacy Benefit Managers in the Crosshairs of Enforcement and Reform
Pharmacy benefit managers have been in the crosshairs of enforcement and reform efforts for several years. At the federal level, the Federal Trade Commission has obtained favorable settlements for the government, and Congress passed PBM reform in the Comprehensive Appropriations Act in February. Some states have also enacted their own legislation, which has become the latest battleground as PBMs level constitutional challenges to state efforts to regulate PBMs’ limitations on where and how patients can fill prescriptions. The outcome of these challenges may dictate whether other states take similar action, and whether PBM influence on pharmacy selection continues to grow. To continue reading Amy N. Vegari and Sarah Brand Wasson's article in The National Law Journal, please click here.
Firm News
Barbara Mullin Named Among Benchmark Litigation’s 2026 Top 250 Women in Litigation
Partner Barbara Mullin has been named one of Benchmark Litigation’s 2026 Top 250 Women in Litigation. The ranking uses an extensive research process, including “months of investigation into individual litigators’ professional activities as well as client feedback surveys and one-on-one interviews” to identify women who are “top players” in their field. To learn more, please click here.
Event
Michael Arlein to Speak on Digital Asset Estate Planning Webinar
On Wednesday, October 14, Partner Michael Arlein will speak on a SMQKE Room webinar titled "Digital Asset Estate Planning for Crypto Founders & Holders." Mr. Arlein will share practical guidance on the legal mechanics and multi-generational planning required for significant digital asset holdings.
Publication
DOJ Revises Justice Manual to Strengthen False Claims Act Enforcement
On September 18, 2026, the Department of Justice announced two revisions to the Justice Manual aimed at strengthening False Claims Act (“FCA”) enforcement. The first revision reinforces DOJ's longstanding position that sub-regulatory guidance cannot impose legal obligations beyond those established by statute or regulation. The second—and, for companies facing qui tam litigation exposure, the more consequential—directs DOJ attorneys to consider exercising the government's dismissal authority when it declines to intervene in a qui tam action. In particular, where the government does not seek immediate dismissal, the new guidance calls for DOJ to revisit that assessment as the litigation progresses. In other words, when DOJ declines to join a whistleblower lawsuit, its attorneys are now encouraged to affirmatively dismiss unmeritorious complaints....
Firm News
Firm Secures Complete Patent Litigation Victory on Behalf of J&J
On August 31, 2026, Patterson Belknap secured a victory on behalf of Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson) in a Hatch-Waxman patent infringement litigation relating to Spravato®, its blockbuster esketamine nasal spray approved for the treatment of treatment-resistant depression and major depressive disorder with suicidal ideation. This litigation was initiated after an ANDA filing by Sandoz, Inc. (“Sandoz”) in 2023, seeking FDA approval for its generic version of Spravato. Janssen asserted that Sandoz’s proposed generic product would infringe certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 11,446,260, 10,869,844; 11,173,134; and 11,311,500.  Sandoz counterclaimed for declaratory judgment that each of the asserted patent claims was invalid under 35 U.S.C. §103 and/or § 112.  On August 31, 2026, the U.S. District...
Publication
New York Appellate Court Limits the Manhattan DA’s Use of Criminal Turnover Orders to Resolve Disputed Art Ownership
On September 17, 2026, the New York Appellate Division, First Department, issued a major decision in In the Matter of an Application for a Search Warrant to Search the Premises Located at The Art Institute of Chicago. The court considered whether N.Y. Penal Law § 450.10, a criminal turnover statute, authorizes a court to adjudicate disputed ownership of property and order its surrender without affording the holder full civil due process (and instead proceeding by way of a summary proceeding in criminal court). The First Department unanimously held that it does not, vacating a seizure warrant and turnover orders that had directed the Art Institute of Chicago (“AIC”) to surrender a painting to the heirs of a Holocaust victim. (Slip Op....
Blog Post
AI Companies Find Value in Bankrupt Companies
Spirit Airlines filed for bankruptcy in November 2024 and, after emerging from bankruptcy, filed again in August 2025. During the second case, the company tried to find a way to keep the airline in business but to no avail. In May 2026, Spirit Airlines pivoted towards a wind-down and ceased operations. This summer, as a part of its wind-down, Spirit Airlines began marketing its remaining assets. It had plenty of traditional assets to sell. For example, the debtors’ bid procedures motion filed in May 2026 listed the following assets: takeoff and landing slots at LaGuardia Airport; aircraft hangar(s); corporate headquarters; training center; multi-family residential buildings; ground service equipment; spare engines; flight simulators; aircraft maintenance equipment; and assets related to the...
Blog Post
You Win Some and Lose Some: Judge Liman Decides Competing Motions to Compel
On September 4, 2026, District Judge Lewis J. Liman (S.D.N.Y.) granted in part and denied in part Plaintiff Lashify, Inc.’s (“Lashify”) motion to compel discovery and denied Defendants Qingdao Network Technology Co., Ltd., d/b/a UCoolMe and Vivicute Limited’s (“UCoolMe”) motion to compel. Lashify, Inc. v. Qingdao Network Tech. Co., Ltd., No. 25-cv-4183 (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 4, 2026). Lashify’s Motion to Compel Lashify moved to compel UCoolMe to provide responses to discovery requests relating to: (i) product samples and raw materials; (ii) manufacturing; (iii) employees and supply chain; (iv) marketing; and (v) finances. Id. at *2. The Court found that each of those topics were relevant under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a) and that UCoolMe did not sufficiently respond to discovery requests related to...
Blog Post
Delaware Bankruptcy Court Crafts Test Concerning Post-Confirmation “Related-To” Jurisdiction
The filing of a bankruptcy case creates an estate consisting of the debtor’s legal and equitable property. The estate will continue until the debtor’s confirmed plan of reorganization or liquidation goes effective. It will then terminate, and the property will either revest in the reorganized debtor or be transferred to another entity such as a post-confirmation liquidation trust. Now and then, bankruptcy judges face this issue: after plan confirmation, when can a liquidation trustee assert state law claims in a lawsuit filed in the bankruptcy court? In terms of a bankruptcy court’s subject matter jurisdiction, the question can be articulated this way: when can a bankruptcy court have post-confirmation related-to jurisdiction over such claims under 28 U.S.C. section 1334?[i] A bankruptcy judge...
Litigation, Disputes & Investigationsicon right
Exempt Organizations & Private Clientsicon right
Corporate & Transactionsicon right
  • Contact Us
  • Subscribe
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy

1133 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York 10036 | Tel: 212.336.2000
© 2026 Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney Advertising. Website Credits