Patterson Belknap
Microsoft has discontinued support for Internet Explorer. To access the Patterson Belknap website, please install a modern browser like Microsoft Edge or Google Chrome.
We use cookies to enhance your experience of our website and provide us with information on how you use our website. For more information about the way our site uses cookies, please read our Privacy Policy. Click "Accept Cookies" to enable cookies and third-party content or “Decline” to decline the use of cookies.
Accept CookiesDecline
mobile logo
High Contrast Mode
  • Search
  • People
  • Practices
  • Values
    Inclusion and Engagement
    Pro Bono
    Core Values
  • Firm
    About Our Firm
    Careers : Attorneys
    Careers: Business Services
    Contact Us
    Blogs & Podcasts
    Firm News
    Publications
    Events
Skip Nav
Patterson Belknap Logo
Inclusion and Engagement
Pro Bono
Core Values
About Our Firm
Careers
AttorneysBusiness Services
Contact Us
News & Resources
Blogs & PodcastsFirm NewsPublicationsEvents

Find a Person


Search
  • A
    B
    C
    D
    E
    F
    G
    H
    I
    J
    K
    L
    M
  • N
    O
    P
    Q
    R
    S
    T
    U
    V
    W
    X
    Y
    Z
  • View All
  • A
    B
    C
    D
    E
    F
    G
    H
    I
    J
    K
    L
    M
    N
    O
    P
    Q
    R
    S
    T
    U
    V
    W
    X
    Y
    Z
    View All

Find a Practice

Search
  • Corporate & Transactions
  • Exempt Organizations & Private Clients
  • Litigation, Disputes & Investigations
  • All Practices
printable-logo

Publications

Search

June 23, 2011

Put Up Your Dukes: Supreme Court Hands Advertisers New Weapons to Fight Spurious Class Actions

June 2011

Supreme Court Decision: Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University v. Roche Molecular Systems, Inc.

May 2011

IP Audits: Making the Most of Your Intellectual Property

April 2011

UPDATE: New York Labor Law Amended: The Wage Theft Prevention Act

April 7, 2011

EEOC Releases New Regulations for the Americans with Disabilities Act

April 1, 2011

Final FBAR Rules – Some Retirement Plan Relief But Reporting Obligations Remain

March 2011

NYPMIFA Revisited: A Summary Incorporating the Attorney General's Recent Guidance

February 28, 2011

Supreme Court To Decide Scope of FCA Public Disclosure Bar

February 2, 2011

Recent Developments in the New York False Claims Act

January, 2011

Bank Failures in the US and Bankruptcy Code Section 365(o)

December 2010

Federal Estate, Gift and Generation Skipping Transfer Tax Update

December 2010

In-Plan Roth Rollovers - New Tax Planning Opportunities

December 2010

Employer Notice Regarding Children's Health Insurance Program

December 2010

New York Labor Law Amended: The Wage Theft Prevention Act

Winter 2010-2011

The Legal Canvas, Winter 2010-2011

December 13, 2010

Q&A With Patterson Belknap's Daniel Ruzumna

October 13, 2010

Federal Estate, Gift and Generation Skipping Transfer Tax Update

October 7, 2010

FTC Unveils Stricter Guidelines for Green Marketing

October 1, 2010

National Health Care Reform: The Keys to Maintaining Grandfathered Status (If Desired) and Upcoming Notice Obligations

September 30, 2010

New York Version of UPMIFA Creates Flexibility as well as New Burdens for Nonprofits

September 16, 2010

IRS Automatic Exemption Revocation and Filing Relief Program FAQs

July 20, 2010

National Health Care Reform Legislation - Review of Initial Guidance

July 15, 2010

The Ethical and Practical Considerations of Removing an Incapacitated Trustee

July 2010

Department of Labor Interpretation Expands Availability of FMLA Leave for the Care of Children of Domestic Partners and Others

May 25, 2010

U.S. Supreme Court Unanimously Decides American Needle v. National Football League

April 2010

Navigating National Health Care Reform: What Every Employer Should Know

April 2010

Eligibility for COBRA Subsidy is Expanded for Involuntary Terminations Occurring Through May 31, 2010; Notices Should Be Updated

April 9, 2010

Federal Circuit Reinvigorates the Written Description Requirement

Spring 2010

The Legal Canvas, Spring 2010

March, 2010

Twitter for In-House Counsel

February 11, 2010

Clearing the Way to Work Effectively With Outside Litigation Counsel

February 5, 2010

The Effects of the 401(k) Fair Disclosure and Pension Security Act of 2009 on Employers Sponsoring Defined Contribution Plans: "Enhanced Communications to Participants or More Compliance Pitfalls?"

January 2010

American Needle v. National Football League

December 2009

Changes to New York State Health Coverage Rights Require Employer Coordination With Insurers

December 2009

COBRA Premium Subsidy Program Extended: Immediate Notification Required

December 2009

New IRS "Governance Check Sheet" Will Capture Data on Governance Practices

December 2009

Possible Temporary Estate and GST Tax Repeal

December 2009

New York Department of Labor Update: Use of NYDOL's Pay Date and Pay Rate Notice and Acknowledgement Form is Not Required

November 2009

Notices of Pendency: Protecting Sellers in Contracts for the Sale and Purchase of Real Property

November 2009

Plan Action Required: IRS Issues Updated Safe Harbor Rollover Notices

November 2009

New York Department of Labor Publishes Pay Date and Pay Rate Notice and Acknowledgement Form

October 20, 2009

Effects of the 401(k) Fair Disclosure and Pension Security Act

July 31, 2009

Arbitration Fee-Splitting Agreement Invalidated in Employment Dispute

October 2009

Aggressive Attachment of International Payments Drastically Curbed by Federal Court Decision

October 2009

IRS Issues Guidance on 2009 Required Minimum Distributions for Defined Contribution Retirement Plans

October 2009

FTC Finalizes New Rules Governing Testimonials

October 2009

Written Disclosures of Pay Date and Pay Rate to Be Required for New Hires in New York

September 21, 2009

Court Says "Compare To" Claims Are Actionable

Page 17 of 19

Subscribe

Sign up

Firm Highlights

Publication
DOJ Revises Justice Manual to Strengthen False Claims Act Enforcement
On September 18, 2026, the Department of Justice announced two revisions to the Justice Manual aimed at strengthening False Claims Act (“FCA”) enforcement. The first revision reinforces DOJ's longstanding position that sub-regulatory guidance cannot impose legal obligations beyond those established by statute or regulation. The second—and, for companies facing qui tam litigation exposure, the more consequential—directs DOJ attorneys to consider exercising the government's dismissal authority when it declines to intervene in a qui tam action. In particular, where the government does not seek immediate dismissal, the new guidance calls for DOJ to revisit that assessment as the litigation progresses. In other words, when DOJ declines to join a whistleblower lawsuit, its attorneys are now encouraged to affirmatively dismiss unmeritorious complaints....
Event
Greg Baker to Speak at Practising Law Institute's Broker/Dealer Regulation and Enforcement 2026
On Thursday, October 8, Partner Greg Baker will speak on a panel at the Practising Law Institute's Broker/Dealer Regulation and Enforcement 2026 conference titled "Ethical Issues Facing Lawyers in the Financial Services Industry." Mr. Baker will join James Q. Walker (Partner, Ashurst Perkins Coie), Allison Cambria (Head of Litigation and Regulatory Enforcement - Americas, Deutsche Bank), Ilene B. Marquardt (Head of Legal Engagement, Client Relationship Group, Wells Fargo Advisors), and Christopher K. Williams (Associate General Counsel, Fidelity Investments) to share guidance on managing conflicts of interest and privilege issues. To learn more, please click here.
Firm News
Firm Secures Complete Patent Litigation Victory on Behalf of J&J
On August 31, 2026, Patterson Belknap secured a victory on behalf of Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson) in a Hatch-Waxman patent infringement litigation relating to Spravato®, its blockbuster esketamine nasal spray approved for the treatment of treatment-resistant depression and major depressive disorder with suicidal ideation. This litigation was initiated after an ANDA filing by Sandoz, Inc. (“Sandoz”) in 2023, seeking FDA approval for its generic version of Spravato. Janssen asserted that Sandoz’s proposed generic product would infringe certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 11,446,260, 10,869,844; 11,173,134; and 11,311,500.  Sandoz counterclaimed for declaratory judgment that each of the asserted patent claims was invalid under 35 U.S.C. §103 and/or § 112.  On August 31, 2026, the U.S. District...
Firm News
Barbara Mullin Named Among Benchmark Litigation’s 2026 Top 250 Women in Litigation
Partner Barbara Mullin has been named one of Benchmark Litigation’s 2026 Top 250 Women in Litigation. The ranking uses an extensive research process, including “months of investigation into individual litigators’ professional activities as well as client feedback surveys and one-on-one interviews” to identify women who are “top players” in their field. To learn more, please click here.
Blog Post
You Win Some and Lose Some: Judge Liman Decides Competing Motions to Compel
On September 4, 2026, District Judge Lewis J. Liman (S.D.N.Y.) granted in part and denied in part Plaintiff Lashify, Inc.’s (“Lashify”) motion to compel discovery and denied Defendants Qingdao Network Technology Co., Ltd., d/b/a UCoolMe and Vivicute Limited’s (“UCoolMe”) motion to compel. Lashify, Inc. v. Qingdao Network Tech. Co., Ltd., No. 25-cv-4183 (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 4, 2026). Lashify’s Motion to Compel Lashify moved to compel UCoolMe to provide responses to discovery requests relating to: (i) product samples and raw materials; (ii) manufacturing; (iii) employees and supply chain; (iv) marketing; and (v) finances. Id. at *2. The Court found that each of those topics were relevant under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a) and that UCoolMe did not sufficiently respond to discovery requests related to...
Blog Post
Delaware Bankruptcy Court Crafts Test Concerning Post-Confirmation “Related-To” Jurisdiction
The filing of a bankruptcy case creates an estate consisting of the debtor’s legal and equitable property. The estate will continue until the debtor’s confirmed plan of reorganization or liquidation goes effective. It will then terminate, and the property will either revest in the reorganized debtor or be transferred to another entity such as a post-confirmation liquidation trust. Now and then, bankruptcy judges face this issue: after plan confirmation, when can a liquidation trustee assert state law claims in a lawsuit filed in the bankruptcy court? In terms of a bankruptcy court’s subject matter jurisdiction, the question can be articulated this way: when can a bankruptcy court have post-confirmation related-to jurisdiction over such claims under 28 U.S.C. section 1334?[i] A bankruptcy judge...
Blog Post
AI Companies Find Value in Bankrupt Companies
Spirit Airlines filed for bankruptcy in November 2024 and, after emerging from bankruptcy, filed again in August 2025. During the second case, the company tried to find a way to keep the airline in business but to no avail. In May 2026, Spirit Airlines pivoted towards a wind-down and ceased operations. This summer, as a part of its wind-down, Spirit Airlines began marketing its remaining assets. It had plenty of traditional assets to sell. For example, the debtors’ bid procedures motion filed in May 2026 listed the following assets: takeoff and landing slots at LaGuardia Airport; aircraft hangar(s); corporate headquarters; training center; multi-family residential buildings; ground service equipment; spare engines; flight simulators; aircraft maintenance equipment; and assets related to the...
Event
Michael Arlein to Speak on Digital Asset Estate Planning Webinar
On Wednesday, October 14, Partner Michael Arlein will speak on a SMQKE Room webinar titled "Digital Asset Estate Planning for Crypto Founders & Holders." Mr. Arlein will share practical guidance on the legal mechanics and multi-generational planning required for significant digital asset holdings.
Publication
Pharmacy Benefit Managers in the Crosshairs of Enforcement and Reform
Pharmacy benefit managers have been in the crosshairs of enforcement and reform efforts for several years. At the federal level, the Federal Trade Commission has obtained favorable settlements for the government, and Congress passed PBM reform in the Comprehensive Appropriations Act in February. Some states have also enacted their own legislation, which has become the latest battleground as PBMs level constitutional challenges to state efforts to regulate PBMs’ limitations on where and how patients can fill prescriptions. The outcome of these challenges may dictate whether other states take similar action, and whether PBM influence on pharmacy selection continues to grow. To continue reading Amy N. Vegari and Sarah Brand Wasson's article in The National Law Journal, please click here.
Publication
New York Appellate Court Limits the Manhattan DA’s Use of Criminal Turnover Orders to Resolve Disputed Art Ownership
On September 17, 2026, the New York Appellate Division, First Department, issued a major decision in In the Matter of an Application for a Search Warrant to Search the Premises Located at The Art Institute of Chicago. The court considered whether N.Y. Penal Law § 450.10, a criminal turnover statute, authorizes a court to adjudicate disputed ownership of property and order its surrender without affording the holder full civil due process (and instead proceeding by way of a summary proceeding in criminal court). The First Department unanimously held that it does not, vacating a seizure warrant and turnover orders that had directed the Art Institute of Chicago (“AIC”) to surrender a painting to the heirs of a Holocaust victim. (Slip Op....
Publication
DOJ Revises Justice Manual to Strengthen False Claims Act Enforcement
On September 18, 2026, the Department of Justice announced two revisions to the Justice Manual aimed at strengthening False Claims Act (“FCA”) enforcement. The first revision reinforces DOJ's longstanding position that sub-regulatory guidance cannot impose legal obligations beyond those established by statute or regulation. The second—and, for companies facing qui tam litigation exposure, the more consequential—directs DOJ attorneys to consider exercising the government's dismissal authority when it declines to intervene in a qui tam action. In particular, where the government does not seek immediate dismissal, the new guidance calls for DOJ to revisit that assessment as the litigation progresses. In other words, when DOJ declines to join a whistleblower lawsuit, its attorneys are now encouraged to affirmatively dismiss unmeritorious complaints....
Event
Greg Baker to Speak at Practising Law Institute's Broker/Dealer Regulation and Enforcement 2026
On Thursday, October 8, Partner Greg Baker will speak on a panel at the Practising Law Institute's Broker/Dealer Regulation and Enforcement 2026 conference titled "Ethical Issues Facing Lawyers in the Financial Services Industry." Mr. Baker will join James Q. Walker (Partner, Ashurst Perkins Coie), Allison Cambria (Head of Litigation and Regulatory Enforcement - Americas, Deutsche Bank), Ilene B. Marquardt (Head of Legal Engagement, Client Relationship Group, Wells Fargo Advisors), and Christopher K. Williams (Associate General Counsel, Fidelity Investments) to share guidance on managing conflicts of interest and privilege issues. To learn more, please click here.
Firm News
Firm Secures Complete Patent Litigation Victory on Behalf of J&J
On August 31, 2026, Patterson Belknap secured a victory on behalf of Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson) in a Hatch-Waxman patent infringement litigation relating to Spravato®, its blockbuster esketamine nasal spray approved for the treatment of treatment-resistant depression and major depressive disorder with suicidal ideation. This litigation was initiated after an ANDA filing by Sandoz, Inc. (“Sandoz”) in 2023, seeking FDA approval for its generic version of Spravato. Janssen asserted that Sandoz’s proposed generic product would infringe certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 11,446,260, 10,869,844; 11,173,134; and 11,311,500.  Sandoz counterclaimed for declaratory judgment that each of the asserted patent claims was invalid under 35 U.S.C. §103 and/or § 112.  On August 31, 2026, the U.S. District...
Firm News
Barbara Mullin Named Among Benchmark Litigation’s 2026 Top 250 Women in Litigation
Partner Barbara Mullin has been named one of Benchmark Litigation’s 2026 Top 250 Women in Litigation. The ranking uses an extensive research process, including “months of investigation into individual litigators’ professional activities as well as client feedback surveys and one-on-one interviews” to identify women who are “top players” in their field. To learn more, please click here.
Blog Post
You Win Some and Lose Some: Judge Liman Decides Competing Motions to Compel
On September 4, 2026, District Judge Lewis J. Liman (S.D.N.Y.) granted in part and denied in part Plaintiff Lashify, Inc.’s (“Lashify”) motion to compel discovery and denied Defendants Qingdao Network Technology Co., Ltd., d/b/a UCoolMe and Vivicute Limited’s (“UCoolMe”) motion to compel. Lashify, Inc. v. Qingdao Network Tech. Co., Ltd., No. 25-cv-4183 (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 4, 2026). Lashify’s Motion to Compel Lashify moved to compel UCoolMe to provide responses to discovery requests relating to: (i) product samples and raw materials; (ii) manufacturing; (iii) employees and supply chain; (iv) marketing; and (v) finances. Id. at *2. The Court found that each of those topics were relevant under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a) and that UCoolMe did not sufficiently respond to discovery requests related to...
Blog Post
Delaware Bankruptcy Court Crafts Test Concerning Post-Confirmation “Related-To” Jurisdiction
The filing of a bankruptcy case creates an estate consisting of the debtor’s legal and equitable property. The estate will continue until the debtor’s confirmed plan of reorganization or liquidation goes effective. It will then terminate, and the property will either revest in the reorganized debtor or be transferred to another entity such as a post-confirmation liquidation trust. Now and then, bankruptcy judges face this issue: after plan confirmation, when can a liquidation trustee assert state law claims in a lawsuit filed in the bankruptcy court? In terms of a bankruptcy court’s subject matter jurisdiction, the question can be articulated this way: when can a bankruptcy court have post-confirmation related-to jurisdiction over such claims under 28 U.S.C. section 1334?[i] A bankruptcy judge...
Litigation, Disputes & Investigationsicon right
Exempt Organizations & Private Clientsicon right
Corporate & Transactionsicon right
  • Contact Us
  • Subscribe
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy

1133 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York 10036 | Tel: 212.336.2000
© 2026 Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney Advertising. Website Credits