Back to Publications
November 9, 2022

The Pinckney Plan, Dubious History and Originalism

The National Law Journal

If eighteenth century history is to dictate the meaning of our Constitution today, and into the future, then the Supreme Court should modestly recognize its own limitations and take great care to get that history right.

Originalism has become the predominant form of constitutional interpretation in the Supreme Court, a rebuttal to the notion that the Constitution is a living document.

To continue reading Gregory Diskant's article in the National Law Journal, please click here [a subscription may be required to view].