LGBTQ+ Rights
LGBTQ+ Rights
LGBTQ+ Rights

Patterson Belknap has a strong record of pro bono service on behalf of LGBTQ+ clients, and stands together with the LGBTQ+ community in its fight for equality. In addition to the below highlights, our attorneys have successfully represented numerous LGBTQ+ refugees in the United States seeking asylum because of persecution in their home countries.

Matter Highlights
Firm Secures Preliminary Injunction in First Amendment Lawsuit on Behalf of Pride Celebration

Patterson Belknap achieved a notable victory for Naples Pride in a First Amendment lawsuit challenging the City of Naples’ restrictions on a drag performance scheduled as part of Naples Pride’s 2025 Pridefest. The U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida granted the firm’s motion for a preliminary injunction, finding that the City’s indoors-only and adults-only restrictions on the family-friendly event violated the First Amendment by burdening the protected speech of Naples Pride, and allowed the Pride celebration to continue as planned.

Firm Achieves Significant Victory for Transgender Client in Anti-Discrimination Lawsuit

Partnering with the ACLU, Patterson Belknap represented Jesse Hammons, a transgender man who sued the University of Maryland Medical Center for denying him surgery based on an unconstitutional and discriminatory application of religious doctrine. Mr. Hammons’ medically necessary hysterectomy was cancelled because hospital administrators believed it would violate Catholic religious teachings. After Mr. Hammons sued the hospital for violations of the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, and the nondiscrimination provision of the Affordable Care Act, the District Court of Maryland awarded him summary judgment, holding that the hospital's refusal of the procedure was discriminatory.

Amicus Brief Quoted in Ruling Blocking Idaho’s Attack on Trans and Intersex Student Athletes

Patterson Belknap filed an amicus brief in opposition to an Idaho statute that sought to ban all transgender students from participating on female sports teams and requiring those whose sex was challenged to undergo invasive examinations. The Ninth Circuit upheld a federal district court’s preliminary ruling blocking the statute, directly quoting our brief in its discussion of intersex variations and their prevalence in the population.