We use cookies to enhance your experience of our website and provide us with information on how you use our website. For more information about the way our site uses cookies, please read our Privacy Policy. Click "Accept Cookies" to enable cookies and third-party content or “Decline” to decline the use of cookies.
Accept CookiesDecline
mobile logo
High Contrast Mode
  • Search
  • People
  • Practices
  • Values
    Inclusion and Engagement
    Pro Bono
    Core Values
  • Firm
    About Our Firm
    Careers : Attorneys
    Careers: Business Services
    Contact Us
    Blogs & Podcasts
    Firm News
    Publications
    Events
Skip Nav
Patterson Belknap Logo
Inclusion and Engagement
Pro Bono
Core Values
About Our Firm
Careers
AttorneysBusiness Services
Contact Us
News & Resources
Blogs & PodcastsFirm NewsPublicationsEvents

Find a Person


Search
  • A
    B
    C
    D
    E
    F
    G
    H
    I
    J
    K
    L
    M
  • N
    O
    P
    Q
    R
    S
    T
    U
    V
    W
    X
    Y
    Z
  • View All
  • A
    B
    C
    D
    E
    F
    G
    H
    I
    J
    K
    L
    M
    N
    O
    P
    Q
    R
    S
    T
    U
    V
    W
    X
    Y
    Z
    View All

Find a Practice

Search
  • Corporate & Transactions
  • Exempt Organizations & Private Clients
  • Litigation, Disputes & Investigations
  • All Practices
printable-logo

How to Build a Nation in 15 Weeks

Categories / Search
Categories / Search

Search Blog

Search
Posts
Bibliography - Seasons 1 & 2
Bibliography - Season 3

Week 16, Part 2: Get the People to Sign Off

The Constitution goes public, and Congress sends it to the states for consideration. Adams and Jefferson react, and confirm that the delegates probably should have added a Bill of Rights. The Federalists and Anti-Federalists square off. The states ratify and create...
September 20, 2018

Week 16, Part 1: Look for Unanimity, if You Can Find It

A little-known clerk inscribes the parchment we all know. Franklin urges unanimity in supporting the Constitution and proposes a convenient form of signing, but Randolph, Gerry, and Mason aren’t impressed. Washington speaks up for a more representative House, and a final...
September 18, 2018

Week 15, Part 2: Don’t Forget a Bill of Rights

Mason seeks a few hours to add a Bill of Rights. The delegates reject the idea, but regret it later. Everyone ends up with a different understanding of the commerce clause. The delegates have a raucous party at the City...
September 13, 2018

Week 15, Part 1: Leave the Door Open for Change

Gerry worries about weakening the role of the states in the amendment process; Hamilton wants to leave them out altogether. Wilson declares it worse than folly for Congress to have a say in ratification. The Committee of Style offers a...
September 11, 2018

Week 14, Part 2: Find Something for the Vice President to Do

The delegates debate the duties of the Vice President, where he belongs, and if he’s even necessary. Particular powers of the executive are considered, and the delegates fleetingly revisit impeachment. Mason resurrects the Privy Council to advise on appointments, but King kills...
September 6, 2018

Week 14, Part 1: Don’t Elect a Minion or a Monster

The delegates discuss the limits of ineligibility. Madison has a change of heart regarding general welfare. The delegates introduce the Vice President (finally). Morris methodically defends the electoral college, Rutledge tries to stall, and Gerry makes things needlessly complicated (again). Wilson...
September 4, 2018

Week 13, Part 2: Fill in the Blanks

The delegates debate the addition of new states to the union. Connecticut sticks up for Vermont, Wilson freaks out, and Martin gets in some good zingers. The delegates decide how many states should be required for ratification after some complex proposals. Morris...
August 30, 2018

Week 13, Part 1: Don’t Go Back on Your Word

The delegates return to the pardon power. Sherman proposes federalizing state militias. Dickinson tries to expand judicial impeachment. Pinckney protects religious liberty. Randolph loses his cool. The delegates debate supermajority requirements for laws regulating commerce after some Southern delegates walk away from their promises....
August 28, 2018

Week 12, Part 2: Don’t Defer Critical Issues for Two Decades

Luther Martin rails against slavery, and Georgia and South Carolina rail back. An awful compromise is reached based on some unexpected alliances. Mason advocates for sumptuary laws, but the other delegates decide that the law of necessity is enough. The...
August 23, 2018

Week 12, Part 1: Good Rules Shouldn’t Go Without Saying

Pinckney proposes incorporating individual rights, but the delegates don’t have much interest. Treason is narrowly defined by the Convention. The delegates debate ex post facto laws, and Wilson assumes a bit too much. The delegates revisit the issue of slavery,...
August 21, 2018

Week 11, Part 2: Fight about Fighting

The delegates worry about insurrection, but dispute when the national government can step in. Gerry tries to limit the size of standing armies. Washington gets sarcastic. The Convention gives Congress the exclusive power to “declare” war, but gives the President...
August 16, 2018

Week 11, Part 1: Wrap Up Some Loose Ends (and Create a Few More)

The delegates narrowly decide against relaxing citizenship requirements. The Convention debates the Senate’s ability to alter spending bills. Dickinson urges experience as the only guide, as “reason may mislead us,” Madison notes some ambiguities, and Randolph and Rutledge worry about...
August 14, 2018

Bonus Episode: Interview with Professor Mary Bilder

In this bonus episode, we had the pleasure of speaking with Professor Mary Bilder, the author of Madison’s Hand: Revising the Constitutional Convention, a detailed study of Madison’s Notes of the Constitutional Convention. We discussed the nature of legislative diaries...
August 13, 2018

Week 10, Part 2: Don’t Forget Who Got You This Far

Morris tries to save the country from aristocracy through aristocracy.  Pinckney takes things too far on behalf of the 1%. Conflicting principles and pragmatic concerns prevent the adoption of property restrictions. The delegates debate citizenship requirements, disregarding the feelings of...
August 9, 2018

Week 10, Part 1: Always Sweat the Details

The delegates gradually return from recess, though New Jersey takes its time crossing the river. The Committee of Detail takes some liberties in drafting. The draft constitution is distributed, and Maryland receives it poorly. Madison fears too many congressmen. The...
August 7, 2018

Week 9, Part 2: Get It in Writing

The delegates brainstorm ever-wilder methods for selecting the executive, but end up back where they started. Franklin argues that leaving public office is a promotion, and gets sassed by Morris. Mason proposes property qualifications for elected officials, but Madison stands...
July 26, 2018

Week 9, Part 1: Don’t Choose Your President with a Game Show

New Hampshire finally shows up, without a per diem. The delegates debate the process for ratification and whether state legislatures can be trusted to do anything right. Nathaniel Gorham asks what will happen if Rhode Island won’t play along. Everyone...
July 24, 2018

Week 8, Part 2: When in Doubt, Keep it Vague

The delegates revisit the Executive Power. The Judicial Branch finally comes up again and the delegates debate how to pick judges. Nathaniel Gorham proposes that the Executive pick judges with the Senate’s “advice and consent,” though nobody really knows what...
July 19, 2018

Week 8, Part 1: Compromise! (If You Can’t Beat Them, Join Them)

The delegates finally compromise on representation when the large states throw in the towel. Roger Sherman tries to protect state police powers. The delegates reject a veto of state legislation but unanimously support making federal laws supreme. The Patterson team...
July 17, 2018

Week 7, Part 2: Call Things By Their True Names

Debate continues on whether and how to account for enslaved people in determining representation in the legislature.  The North-South divide widens.  The delegates tie representation to taxation and approve the three-fifths ratio for both.  The delegates try to semantically conceal...
July 12, 2018

Week 7, Part 1: Confront the Paradox at Your Nation’s Core (Or Don’t)

The delegates debate how to apportion representation in the lower house. The Morris Committee proposes an allocation based on guesswork. The King Committee proposes an alternative based on counting three-fifths of enslaved people. The delegates debate whether and how to factor enslaved people...
July 10, 2018

Week 6, Part 2: Don’t Underestimate the Power of a Mid-Week Vacation

The delegates celebrate Independence Day. Gerry presents the committee’s proposal to the Convention with diffidence. A subcommittee is formed to address the calculation of proportional representation. The Patterson team ponders the Spirit of ’76, the benefits of some time off, and the...
July 5, 2018

Week 6, Part 1: If All Else Fails, Try a Committee

Delegates start to flee the Convention. Hamilton and Washington get pessimistic. The delegates deadlock over proportional versus equal state representation. Connecticut renews its proposal. The Gerry Committee tackles the question of legislative representation after being stacked with small-state friendly delegates. The Patterson team...
July 3, 2018

Bonus Episode: Interview with Professor Joshua Matz

On this special bonus episode, we had the pleasure of interviewing Joshua Matz, author with Professor Laurence Tribe of the excellent new book To End a Presidency: The Power of Impeachment. Joshua discussed with us what we can learn from the...
July 2, 2018

Week 5, Part 2: Maybe Say a Prayer?

The delegates debate whether Senators should be paid. South Carolina argues for rule by the wealthy. The delegates agree on six-year Senate terms. Ben Franklin suggests the convention seek divine inspiration. The Patterson team considers how much democracy is too...
June 28, 2018

Week 5, Part 1: Don't Mortify The Other Delegates

Luther Martin delivers a two-day speech with much diffuseness. Madison argues the small states have nothing to fear.  Connecticut proposes a compromise. The mood amongst the delegates continues to deteriorate. Madison accuses Connecticut of failing to support to war effort....
June 26, 2018

Week 4, Part 2: Try to Keep Your Cool When Your Plan Falls Apart

The convention falls into chaos.  Madison’s judgment slips, and he makes not-so-veiled threats against small states.  Additional delegates try to push their own extreme visions.  Connecticut tries to restore peace. 
June 21, 2018

Week 4, Part 1: Read the Room

Hamilton finally speaks up, keeps speaking straight through lunch, damages his reputation, and is otherwise ignored.  The benefits and perils of an elective monarchy and legislature.  The Patterson team revisits the utility of the electoral college, muses about Old Bacon...
June 19, 2018

Week 3: Don’t Push Your Plan Too Far

The Large States and Deep South support one another. Gerry takes on the three-fifths compromise. New Jersey stalls for time and introduces an alternative plan for a federal government. The Patterson team  takes the New Jersey plan seriously.
June 13, 2018

Week 2, Part 2: Figure Out Who Judges the Judges

Delegates debate whether lower federal courts are worth the money and how to select judges. Franklin makes an unorthodox proposal. The council of revision resurfaces and the judicial veto is rejected. The delegates debate the method of electing Senators. Wilson...
June 7, 2018

Week 2, Part 1: Push Past Your Fear of Kings

Virginia presses its plan with broad outlines for the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Fear and loathing of a return to a monarchy. The delegates nonetheless opt for a single executive, with a veto, but defer how they will be elected....
June 5, 2018

Week 1: Showing Up is Half the Battle

The convention opens. The Virginia delegation introduces its plan for Government including a national executive, national judiciary, and, crucially, proportional representation in the national legislature. The small states are not pleased. Pinckney’s plan is ignored. The Patterson team takes an historical detour...
May 30, 2018

Introduction: “The difficulty of the crisis, and the necessity of preventing the fulfilment of the prophecies of the American downfall.”

Introducing a new podcast from Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP. Who we are and what we do. The constant presence of the constitution in our daily civic life, and the benefits of discussing and learning from it. General approach...
May 23, 2018

Page 2 of 2

About This Podcast

Building a nation in 15 weeks may sound like a daunting summer project, but that’s just what happened at the Constitutional Convention in the summer of 1787. The first season of our podcast revisits the hottest topics from that convention, week by week, and tracks their current place in our legal and political landscape. In our second season, that same analysis is brought to the history of the Constitution in the early republic era in the first few decades of our country’s history, from ratification to the Bill of Rights to the early amendments. Our third season moves forward to cover the Reconstruction era, including the 13th, 14th, and 15th amendments, and the 19th amendment, ratified in 1920. Building on our study of history and our experience as attorneys, we ask questions that tie the past to the present: Does today’s Supreme Court think about separation of powers in the same way that the Committee of Detail did? How did the Constitution overcome anti-Federalist opposition to get ratified? What was the intended scope of the 14th Amendment? These are some of the questions that our co-hosts, former Assistant U.S. Attorney and frequent legal commentator Harry Sandick and commercial litigator and history enthusiast Jon Hatch will examine in a roundtable format, along with their colleagues at Patterson Belknap.

Podcast Contributors

  • Contact Harry Sandick.

    Harry Sandick

    212.336.2723

    Email

  • Contact Andrew I. Haddad.

    Andrew I. Haddad

    212.336.2331

    Email

  • Contact Joshua Kipnees.

    Joshua Kipnees

    212.336.2838

    Email

  • Contact Tara J. Norris.

    Tara J. Norris

    212.336.2847

    Email

  • Contact Julie A. Simeone.

    Julie A. Simeone

    212.336.2086

    Email

Posts
Bibliography - Seasons 1 & 2
Bibliography - Season 3

Firm Highlights

Firm News
Firm Attorneys Honored for Pro Bono Work by Sanctuary for Families
On Wednesday, October 28, 2026, Partner Lauren Schorr Potter and Associates Folasade Famakinwa, Jillian Horowitz, and Tiffany Li were honored by Sanctuary for Families with the 2026 Above & Beyond Pro Bono Achievement Award for achievements in connection with their pro bono work. Ms. Potter, Ms. Famakinwa, and Ms. Li were recognized for their work successfully representing a survivor of sexual abuse as a victim witness in a high-profile federal criminal trial that received significant public attention. The team guided the client through an intense period of preparation, including numerous meetings and testimony preparation, coordination with the U.S. Attorney’s Office, and support on trial days. Sanctuary for Families celebrated “not only the team’s legal advocacy, but also the extraordinary care, commitment,...
Event
Thomas Kurland to Speak on Social Media Mass Torts at ACI’s 2026 Drug & Medical Device Litigation Conference
On Wednesday, December 2, Partner Thomas Kurland will speak on a panel titled "The New Mental Health Mass Tort: Product Design, Warnings, and Causation Lessons from the Social Media Litigation" at the American Conference Institute's Drug & Medical Device Litigation conference.  Mr. Kurland will join Manuel F. Cachán (Partner, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP), TaCara Harris (Partner, King & Spalding), and Jobina Jones-McDonnell (VP and Assistant General Counsel, Litigation and Risk, Keenova) to discuss the growing field of social media mass tort litigation and how it relates to—and may end up impacting—more mature mass torts involving pharmaceuticals and medical devices. To learn more, please click here.
Blog Post
You Win Some and Lose Some: Judge Liman Decides Competing Motions to Compel
On September 4, 2026, District Judge Lewis J. Liman (S.D.N.Y.) granted in part and denied in part Plaintiff Lashify, Inc.’s (“Lashify”) motion to compel discovery and denied Defendants Qingdao Network Technology Co., Ltd., d/b/a UCoolMe and Vivicute Limited’s (“UCoolMe”) motion to compel. Lashify, Inc. v. Qingdao Network Tech. Co., Ltd., No. 25-cv-4183 (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 4, 2026). Lashify’s Motion to Compel Lashify moved to compel UCoolMe to provide responses to discovery requests relating to: (i) product samples and raw materials; (ii) manufacturing; (iii) employees and supply chain; (iv) marketing; and (v) finances. Id. at *2. The Court found that each of those topics were relevant under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a) and that UCoolMe did not sufficiently respond to discovery requests related to...
Blog Post
Can Subchapter V’s Increased Debt Limit Save In-Court Business Reorganizations?
Chapter 11 is intended to enable businesses to reorganize while continuing normal operations under the control of existing management. The primary goal of chapter 11 is for companies to reorganize rather than liquidate to the benefit of owners, employees, suppliers, customers and others relying on the businesses’ ongoing survival. But the process has become expensive. Some would-be chapter 11 debtors opt out of the court process altogether, instead seeking out-of-court options, including consensual debt restructurings and liability management exercises (or “LMEs”). These debtors seek to renegotiate their debts to make shifts within their capital structure without the expense of a bankruptcy filing. When companies do file chapter 11, they often do so with prepackaged or pre-negotiated plans of reorganization, which...
Publication
The Billion-Dollar Interview: How the Wrong Hiring Process Can Create Personal Liability for Founders
The right talent can make or break a startup, and effective founders build recruiting processes to land exceptional people. But a process built to win talent can, if run the wrong way, expose a founder to personal liability to the competitor they are hiring from. A recent lawsuit by Apple shows how. Tang Tan spent 24 years at Apple, rising to vice president of product design for the iPhone and Apple Watch. After co-founding startup io Products and selling the company to OpenAI, he was tasked with building OpenAI’s hardware team. He turned to the engineers he knew best: Apple’s. Tan’s interviews were hands-on. Candidates explained their contributions and engineering decisions and brought physical components from Apple to illustrate their work at...
Event
Andrew Haddad to Speak on American Bar Association Webinar
On Thursday, November 12, Counsel Andrew Haddad will speak on an American Bar Association webinar titled "United Against Fakes: The Counterfeit Drug Problem." Mr. Haddad will join Laura Manschreck (Partner, Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP) and Erin McDermott (Principal, Charles River Associates) to explore the rise of counterfeit life sciences products and its impact on manufacturers and discuss the latest enforcement and litigation trends. To learn more, please click here.
Blog Post
Delaware Bankruptcy Court Crafts Test Concerning Post-Confirmation “Related-To” Jurisdiction
The filing of a bankruptcy case creates an estate consisting of the debtor’s legal and equitable property. The estate will continue until the debtor’s confirmed plan of reorganization or liquidation goes effective. It will then terminate, and the property will either revest in the reorganized debtor or be transferred to another entity such as a post-confirmation liquidation trust. Now and then, bankruptcy judges face this issue: after plan confirmation, when can a liquidation trustee assert state law claims in a lawsuit filed in the bankruptcy court? In terms of a bankruptcy court’s subject matter jurisdiction, the question can be articulated this way: when can a bankruptcy court have post-confirmation related-to jurisdiction over such claims under 28 U.S.C. section 1334?[i] A bankruptcy judge...
Publication
New York Restricts “Pay or Stay” Agreements Under the Trapped at Work Act
New York employers will soon face new restrictions on agreements requiring employees to repay certain amounts if their employment ends before a specified period of time. New York’s Trapped at Work Act (the “Act”) generally prohibits employers from requiring employees or prospective employees, as a condition of employment, to enter into so-called “pay or stay” agreements, subject to exceptions for certain educational expenses, bonuses, relocation assistance, and other incentive payments. Originally enacted in December 2025 and amended in February 2026, the Act left some uncertainty as to whether its effective date would be December 19, 2026 or February 13, 2027. On October 22, 2026, the New York State Department of Labor (“NYSDOL”) issued guidance confirming that the Act will take effect...
Firm News
Firm Lawyers Honored for Pro Bono Work by New York County Lawyers Association
On Tuesday, October 20, 2026, the New York County Lawyers Association (NYCLA) recognized three firm attorneys for achievements in connection with their pro bono work. Shelley Attadgie was recognized for her work related to the State Central Registry (SCR) Project. Ms. Attadgie represented a client in connection with a petition to amend and seal a report entered against them in the SCR by the Administration for Children's Services. Ms. Attadgie prepared the client for his hearing testimony before an Administrative Law Judge, drafted and collected supporting evidence, cross-examined the Agency’s witness, and assisted the client with his direct testimony. Following the two-day hearing, the finding of maltreatment was amended to unfounded and sealed, removing a significant barrier that had impacted the client...
Publication
Delaware Bankruptcy Court Crafts Test Concerning Post-Confirmation 'Related-To' Jurisdiction
The filing of a Chapter 11 bankruptcy case creates an estate consisting of the debtor’s legal and equitable property. The estate will continue until the debtor’s confirmed plan of reorganization or liquidation goes effective. It will then terminate, and the property will either revest in the reorganized debtor or be transferred to another entity such as a post-confirmation liquidation trust. Now and then, bankruptcy judges face this issue: after plan confirmation, when can a liquidation trustee assert state law claims in a lawsuit filed in the bankruptcy court? In terms of a bankruptcy court’s subject matter jurisdiction, the question is this: when can a bankruptcy court have post-confirmation related-to jurisdiction over such claims under 28 U.S.C. section 1334? (Related-to jurisdiction is part...
Firm News
Firm Attorneys Honored for Pro Bono Work by Sanctuary for Families
On Wednesday, October 28, 2026, Partner Lauren Schorr Potter and Associates Folasade Famakinwa, Jillian Horowitz, and Tiffany Li were honored by Sanctuary for Families with the 2026 Above & Beyond Pro Bono Achievement Award for achievements in connection with their pro bono work. Ms. Potter, Ms. Famakinwa, and Ms. Li were recognized for their work successfully representing a survivor of sexual abuse as a victim witness in a high-profile federal criminal trial that received significant public attention. The team guided the client through an intense period of preparation, including numerous meetings and testimony preparation, coordination with the U.S. Attorney’s Office, and support on trial days. Sanctuary for Families celebrated “not only the team’s legal advocacy, but also the extraordinary care, commitment,...
Event
Thomas Kurland to Speak on Social Media Mass Torts at ACI’s 2026 Drug & Medical Device Litigation Conference
On Wednesday, December 2, Partner Thomas Kurland will speak on a panel titled "The New Mental Health Mass Tort: Product Design, Warnings, and Causation Lessons from the Social Media Litigation" at the American Conference Institute's Drug & Medical Device Litigation conference.  Mr. Kurland will join Manuel F. Cachán (Partner, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP), TaCara Harris (Partner, King & Spalding), and Jobina Jones-McDonnell (VP and Assistant General Counsel, Litigation and Risk, Keenova) to discuss the growing field of social media mass tort litigation and how it relates to—and may end up impacting—more mature mass torts involving pharmaceuticals and medical devices. To learn more, please click here.
Blog Post
You Win Some and Lose Some: Judge Liman Decides Competing Motions to Compel
On September 4, 2026, District Judge Lewis J. Liman (S.D.N.Y.) granted in part and denied in part Plaintiff Lashify, Inc.’s (“Lashify”) motion to compel discovery and denied Defendants Qingdao Network Technology Co., Ltd., d/b/a UCoolMe and Vivicute Limited’s (“UCoolMe”) motion to compel. Lashify, Inc. v. Qingdao Network Tech. Co., Ltd., No. 25-cv-4183 (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 4, 2026). Lashify’s Motion to Compel Lashify moved to compel UCoolMe to provide responses to discovery requests relating to: (i) product samples and raw materials; (ii) manufacturing; (iii) employees and supply chain; (iv) marketing; and (v) finances. Id. at *2. The Court found that each of those topics were relevant under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a) and that UCoolMe did not sufficiently respond to discovery requests related to...
Blog Post
Can Subchapter V’s Increased Debt Limit Save In-Court Business Reorganizations?
Chapter 11 is intended to enable businesses to reorganize while continuing normal operations under the control of existing management. The primary goal of chapter 11 is for companies to reorganize rather than liquidate to the benefit of owners, employees, suppliers, customers and others relying on the businesses’ ongoing survival. But the process has become expensive. Some would-be chapter 11 debtors opt out of the court process altogether, instead seeking out-of-court options, including consensual debt restructurings and liability management exercises (or “LMEs”). These debtors seek to renegotiate their debts to make shifts within their capital structure without the expense of a bankruptcy filing. When companies do file chapter 11, they often do so with prepackaged or pre-negotiated plans of reorganization, which...
Publication
The Billion-Dollar Interview: How the Wrong Hiring Process Can Create Personal Liability for Founders
The right talent can make or break a startup, and effective founders build recruiting processes to land exceptional people. But a process built to win talent can, if run the wrong way, expose a founder to personal liability to the competitor they are hiring from. A recent lawsuit by Apple shows how. Tang Tan spent 24 years at Apple, rising to vice president of product design for the iPhone and Apple Watch. After co-founding startup io Products and selling the company to OpenAI, he was tasked with building OpenAI’s hardware team. He turned to the engineers he knew best: Apple’s. Tan’s interviews were hands-on. Candidates explained their contributions and engineering decisions and brought physical components from Apple to illustrate their work at...
Event
Andrew Haddad to Speak on American Bar Association Webinar
On Thursday, November 12, Counsel Andrew Haddad will speak on an American Bar Association webinar titled "United Against Fakes: The Counterfeit Drug Problem." Mr. Haddad will join Laura Manschreck (Partner, Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP) and Erin McDermott (Principal, Charles River Associates) to explore the rise of counterfeit life sciences products and its impact on manufacturers and discuss the latest enforcement and litigation trends. To learn more, please click here.
Litigation, Disputes & Investigationsicon right
Exempt Organizations & Private Clientsicon right
Corporate & Transactionsicon right
  • Contact Us
  • Subscribe
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy

1133 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York 10036 | Tel: 212.336.2000
© 2026 Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney Advertising. Website Credits